Skip to main content

Estimation Based on Energy and Economic Indicators of the Ratio of Primary Energy Production to Consumption (RPC)

Gazi University
Last updated on 8 July 2008
Today, although energy demand forecasting is one of the most common policy tools used by the decision makers around the world, the ratio of energy production to consumption (RPC) becomes a more important parameter on this issue. For a proper energy planning, prediction of at least 10 subsequent years could be necessary since the time between setting up energy production systems and starting the production will be considerably high for the countries that could never ignore the economic stability throughout the country.

There are several factors to determine the energy policies, which are considered to be important for forecasting the future projections in each country. These factors are population growth, the use of energy sources, economic performance, technological developments, import, export, and consumer tastes. In the past, to make futuristic projections towards energy consumptions basic energy indicators have been used [1-19]. Therefore, the correlations between the energy indicators and their effects on the predictions of energy resources have been taken into consideration. Different studies have focused on different countries, time periods, and have used different proxy variables for net energy consumption and energy indicators. There are a few studies that investigate the relationship between economic indicators and energy consumption using different methods and approaches [19-23].

Estimating net energy consumption plays an important role in decision making and planning for governments. In the past, regression analysis has been the most popular modelling technique in predicting net energy consumption. But, the importance of the artificial neural network (ANN) approach, apart from reducing the time required, is that it is possible to make energy applications more viable and thus more attractive to potential users, such as energy engineers. Therefore, the use of ANN for modelling and prediction purposes is becoming increasingly popular recent decades. This is mainly due to the fact that ANN has very good approximation capabilities and offer additional advantages, such as short development and fast processing times. ANNs are especially useful for prediction problems where mathematical formulae and prior knowledge on the relationship between inputs and outputs are unknown.

Currently, the ratio of energy production to consumption (RPC) is considered as a more important parameter than energy demand forecasting which is one of the important policy tools used by the decision makes all over the world. To realize the proper energy planning, approximate changes for the future ten years should be estimated properly.

The ratio of primary energy production to consumption (RPC) was determined as follows:RPC= Total production of primary energy/Final Energy Consumption (1)

As a second parameter, the ratio of primary energy imports to consumption (RIC) was determined as below:

RIC=Net imports of primary energy/Final Energy Consumption (2)

The current assessment and future estimation of RPC and RIC are important for determining the future level of the supply – demand balance and decide proper investments for the future electrical power supply in Turkey.

Further reading

 
  • 1. Kiliç, F.C., Kaya, D., Energy production, consumption, policies, and recent developments in Turkey, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 11 (6), 1312-1320, 2007.
  • 11. Öztürk, K. H., Ceylan, H., Canyurt, O. E., Hepbaşlı, A., Electricity estimation using genetic algorithm approach: a case study of Turkey, Energy, 30(7), 1003-1012, 2005.
  • 12. Sözen, A., Arcaklıoğlu, E., Özkaymak, M., Forecasting Net Energy Consumption Using Artificial Neural Network, Energy Sources, Part B, 1, 147-155, 2006.
  • 13. Sözen, A., Arcaklioğlu, E., Prospects of Future Projections of the Basic Energy Sources in Turkey, Energy Sources, Part B, (in press)
  • 14. Hamzaçebi, C., Forecasting of Turkey’s net electricity energy consumption on sectoral bases, Energy Policy, 35(3), 2009-2016, 2007.
  • 15. Kraft, J., Kraft, A., On the relationship between energy and GNP, Journal of Energy Development, 3, 401-403, 1978.
  • 16. Hwang, D., Gum, B., The casual relationship between energy and GNP: the case of Taiwan, Journal of Energy Development, 16, 219-226, 1991
  • 17. Yu, S.H., Choi, J.Y., The casual relationship between energy and GNP: an international comparison, Journal of Energy Development, 10, 249- 272, 1985
  • 18. Mozumder, P., Marathe, A., Casuality relationship between electricity consumption and GDP in Bangladesh, Energy Policy, 35, 395-402, 2007.
  • 19. Say, N.P., Yücel, M., Energy consumption and CO2 emissions in Turkey: Empirical analysis and future projection based on an economic growth, Energy Policy, 34, 3870-3876, 2006
  • 2. Ediger, V.Ş., Akar, S., ARIMA forecasting of Primary Energy Demand by Fuel in Turkey, Energy Policy, 35(3), 1701-1708, 2007.
  • 20. Lise, W., Montfort, K.V., Energy consumption and GDP in Turkey: Is there a co-integration relationship?, Energy Economics, (in press) .
  • 21. Soytaş, U., Sarı, R., Özdemir, O., Energy consumption and GDP relation in Turkey: a cointegration and vector error correction analysis, Economies and Business in Transition: Facilitating Competitiveness and Change in the Global Environment Proceedings, Global Business and Technology Association, 838-844, 2001.
  • 22. Tunç, M., Çamdalı, Ü., Parmaksızoğlu, C., Comparison of Turkey’s electrical energy consumption and production with some European countries and optimization of future electrical power supply investments in Turkey, Energy Policy, 34, 50-59, 2006.
  • 23. Altinay, G., Karagöl, E., Structural break, unit root, and the casuality between energy consumption and GDP in Turkey, Energy Economics, 26, 985-994, 2004.
  • 3. Ediger, V.S., Tatlidil, H., Forecasting the primary energy demand in Turkey and analysis of cyclic patterns, Energy Conversion and Management, vol.43, 473-487, 2002
  • 4. Özturk, H. K., Canyurt, O. C., Hepbaşlı, A., Utlu, Z., Residential- commercial energy input estimation based on genetic algorithm (GA) approaches: an application of Turkey, Energy and Buildings, 36, 175- 183, 2004.
  • 5. Öztürk, H.K., Yilanci, A., Atalay, Ö., “Past, present and future status of electricity in Turkey and the share of energy sources”, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 11, 183-209, 2007.
  • 6. Dinçer, I., Dost, S., Energy intensities for Canada, Applied energy, 76, 211-217, 1996.
  • 7. WEC-TNC, World Energy Council-Turkish National Committee, Energy Report and Statistics for 1999, 2000, Ankara, Turkey
  • 8. Topçu, Y.I., Ülengin, F., Energy for the future: AN integrated decision aid for the case of Turkey, Energy, 29, 137-154, 2004.
  • 9. Hepbasli, A., Development and restructuring of Turkey’s electricity sector: a review, Reneable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 9(4), 311-343, 2005.
  • Demirbaş, A., Turkey’s energy overview beginning in the twenty-first century, Energy Conversion and Management, 43, 1877-1887, 2002.

Give feedback

 

You can contact the author of this SciTopics page to give feedback on this page.

Suggestions for improvement are welcome!

Your message will be sent privately to the author. It will not be published online.

 

How to cite this page

APA style:

SOZEN, Adnan (2008, July 8). Estimation Based on Energy and Economic Indicators of the Ratio of Primary Energy Production to Consumption (RPC). SciTopics. Retrieved September 9, 2010, from http://www.scitopics.com/Estimation_Based_on_Energy_and_Economic_Indicators_of_the_Ratio_of_Primary_Energy_Production_to_Consumption_RPC.html
Bookmark this page with: